NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Murphy's Law Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Poisonous Ground

July 25, 2009: Israeli defense firms would like to work together with their American counterparts to develop new weapons and equipment. There have been many attempts to do this, and most have ended in a quiet divorce. The cause is usually the American tendency to add bells and whistles that, while popular with American politicians, and their Pentagon allies, are anathema to the frugal Israelis. As a result, the Israelis go on to produce a cheaper, and just (if not more so) effective item. Sometimes the U.S. will end by cancelling their own effort, and buying the Israeli model. The Israelis are hoping that, eventually, the Americans will catch on and learn to do things fast and cheap. This is already happening with the RFI (Rapid Fielding Initiative).

The original RFI program allowed U.S. Army commanders to go out and buy equipment, and even weapons, immediately, without going through the usual lengthily acquisition process. The army began doing this in the 1990s, based on decades of success by Special Forces with a similar approach. So far, this has put over 400 new technologies into Iraq and Afghanistan, and more to come.

The primary problem with RFI is getting repairs and spare parts for the new gear. When the army officially accepts equipment into service, it makes spare parts available through the army supply system, and trains soldiers to do the maintenance. With RFI gear, the users have to go direct to the manufacturer for spares and repairs. Sometimes, civilian technicians will be flown to the combat zone. But more often, army technicians will get in touch with the manufacturer and get advice on how to make the repairs themselves. If possible, broken equipment will be sent back to the factory. The army does this itself, sending all sorts of gear back to army maintenance depots. These are usually run and staffed by civilians. While it's more work to maintain the RFI gear, this helps by making it easier to drop RFI items that don't perform up to expectations. The RFI gear really has to deliver the goods if the troops are going to put up with the additional maintenance burdens.

Now many politicians are noticing the similarity between RFI and the way the Israelis go about military procurement. The seed of reform has been planted. But that's no guarantee that it will grow in the poisonous ground of the Pentagon and the American Congress.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article AIR TRANSPORTATION: India Revives Its Aging An-32s


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Photon       7/25/2009 4:09:22 PM
Until Dept. of Defense can divorce itself from the Congress, the military will keep on repeating loops of inefficiency.  The Congress should only have the power to allocate budget to DoD, but nothing more beyond this point.  It should be DoD and service heads to actually come up with what to do with this budget.  Working with Israel should be of help, as now we have someone else who does things more efficiently as a reference. 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy