NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Leadership Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Why So Many Damn Officers?

September 30, 2009: Some 14 percent of the people in the U.S. Army are officers, and about twenty percent of those are Warrant Officers. This is a special rank for specialists, who outrank all enlisted personnel, but are outranked by all officers. In effect, they are super NCOs who specialize in one particular technical task. Most of the army warrants are pilots, but over a third take care of dozens of technical jobs. All warrants go through a six week "Warrant Officer Candidate School" (WOCS). This is not as rough as the OCS (Officer Candidate School), which lasts twice as long, mainly because nearly all the prospective non-aviation warrants are already sergeants, some quite senior. There are separate WOCS courses for the aviation and non-aviation candidates. For example, a recent WOCS class of 201 sergeants, had prospective warrants headed for the following job specialties; Field Artillery Targeting Technician, Command And Control Systems Integrator, Special Forces Warrant Officer (usually the number two guy on an A Team), Network Management Technician, Information Systems Technician, Signal Systems Support Technician, CID Special Agent (criminal investigator, or detective), All-Source Intelligence Technician, Imagery Intelligence Technician, Attaché Technician (deals with foreigners), Counterintelligence Technician, Human Intelligence Collection Technician, Signals Intelligence Analysis Technician, Human Resources Technician, Marine Deck Officer (the army still has a fleet of supply vessels), Mobility Officer, Armament Systems Maintenance Warrant Officer, Automotive Maintenance Warrant Officer, and Electronic Missile Systems Maintenance Warrant Officer.

The growth in the number of officers is partly justified by the need to offer competitive pay for technical specialists. But the army is stuck, by tradition and bureaucratic inertia, with making highly sought after specialists officers, because the pay scales follow a rigid, and ancient, progression, from recruit, up through the NCO and officer ranks. Historically, the most effective armed forces were those that had only about five percent of their strength are officers. Back in the day, technical jobs were given to civilian professionals, who remained civilians. In fact, the first warrant officers in the U.S. Army, a century ago, were considered civilians (that soon changed). The American military has been using civilian experts, especially for those who were only needed for short periods. The army has also adapted by using the “Warrant Officer” rank for technical specialists. Without these two improvisations, the American army would be nearly twenty percent officers, and many of those officers would basically be civilian technical experts pretending to be officers.

The WOCS aviation graduates go on to a series of aviation schools, while the non-aviation warrants often get shipped right out to a unit that needs them (although most do attend several technical schools.)

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article SUPPORT: Use The Bone


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

rselders    There may be fewer officers in the future   9/30/2009 6:07:26 PM
The author is lamenting the number of officers in the U.S. Army.  This may change with the increase in privatization of support services.  In many areas of support, positions are filled by goverment service or contractors.  The argument for this is the poor retention of skilled workers and the readily available supply trained retirees. 
In my field, positions are filled with new officers or Colonels over 20 years of service with a few in the other field grades.  This is the result of poor retention over decades.  Those that make a home in the Army will make Colonel after a time and then possibly pass to the green fields of contractor. While command has offered incentives for retention, civilian opportunities are competitive even with a flagging economy.
That said, the Army is instituting a program that provides a private insurance company to allow the treatment of Soldiers by civilian providers.  This will deminish the demand on Army sustainment resources.  While no statement has been made, the writing is on the wall for those of us in uniform.  The future of my field is likely to be much reduced, thus getting closer to the magic percentage of commissioned ranks. 
I find the unsupported comment regarding the potency of an Army with 5% of commissioned ranks irritating.  The U.S. Army does not have centurions and phalaxes nor do we use set-piece battles with firing lines.  With the asymmetrical battlefield comes a need for specialized services and abilities to be in greater supply.  I would hope the argument for the number of commissioned officers would not be countered by a historical statistic.
Military officers are not part of a union.  When operation tempo demands activity 24/7, contracts and union stewards would need to be consulted. Even if civilians wanted to work extended hours, it may not be possible.  Ask any commander that has to deal with civilians and I believe management is simplified with green-suiters.
Warrants are a valuable part of the Army.  To view them as a force that is better left to civilian hires is to ignore the service and dedication our misters and cheifs provide. 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy