NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Information Warfare Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Pentagon Profiles Reporters To Save Lives

August 25, 2009: Some journalists are upset that the Department of Defense is now checking the backgrounds on reporters seeking to be embedded with American military units in Iraq or Afghanistan. This has been going on since 2005, and the main purpose of it is to let commanders, and PAO (Public Affairs Officers) know who they are dealing with, especially for reporters who don't have much of a track record to check.

Some reporters have been barred from being embedded, because of their consistently negative, or even erroneous, reporting. Most journalists believe that the military should allow them to embed, no matter what. The military believes that, since they are paying to haul the journalist around, troops are risking their lives to protect them, and hostile or erroneous reporting is bad for morale, and can even get people killed (lie about something like "soldier uses page from Koran for toilet paper, and watch the bodies pile up), there is no good reason to help a journalist who is out to hurt the troops.

The soldiers and marines have seen numerous examples of deceitful, erroneous and blatantly anti-military reporting, and are inclined to side with the brass on this one. The media has not made a big deal about this, the protests being delivered quietly. Politicians don't want to touch this, nor do the suits at the news organizations, because they know that the military attitudes towards journalists have a basis in fact, and don't want to risk the public blowback if they made a big deal out of it.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article COLOMBIA: The Silent Grind


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Bob Cortez       8/25/2009 9:20:35 AM
Why not just have the selection after they get there, rather than before?  Remember that after the USS Thresher went down, the Navy began putting people who built the subs on the shakedown crusise.  Same would work here.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Vulture       8/25/2009 11:04:01 AM
Just have journalists show up with a complete copy of all their articles.  The unit they are embedded with can then assign the appropriate protection value to that embed.
 
 And of course any journalists caught lying about their articles get to be a human mine detector.

 
Quote    Reply

FJV       8/25/2009 11:12:36 AM
With embedding journalists stay as guests with the army. This means that if you are the host then you get to decide which guests you invite and which you don't. And which guests get kicked out.
 
As for not being embedded, that can also be an advantage for a journalist.

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

vhmbnm    Reporter profiles   8/25/2009 11:30:11 PM
I agree there should be a background check on these so-called objective reporter types. Most of the US reporters are trained to not let patriotism enter into their reporting. Others are just anti-American. They would rather jeopardize troop protection than lose a good, negative war story.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy