NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Information Warfare Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Socially Engineered Super Weapons

February 13, 2009: The U.S. Department of Defense is trying new ways to motivate their millions of computer users to resist "social engineering" attacks, where, instead of sneaky computer code, a clever bit of malarkey separates the victims from the data they are supposed to be protecting. The deceptive pitch is usually delivered via an email or popup on your screen. Once you reply (by clicking on the popup message or opening a file attached to the email) a hacker program begins grabbing information off your PC, or even secretly taking control of it. This shows how vulnerable organizations are to losing valuable information via nothing more than an email message or a mouse click.

The new motivation takes the form of announcing that there will be a test attack in, say, the next two weeks. Anyone who takes the bait will be notified, and perhaps required to undergo additional training. This sort of security testing is in addition to the long used "Tiger Team" approach. Tiger Teams use experienced good guy ("white hat") hackers working for a security testing firm, and using the same tools as the bad guy ("black hat") hackers use,  to attack the target system and see just how vulnerable it is.

There are many other ways to gain access to corporate, or military networks, with similar social engineering techniques. For example, just leaving some thumb (flash memory) drives around for your target population to pick up, will see many of the marks plugging the drive into a USB port, where your special software will inflect that system with whatever sneaky software you wanted to get in there. All the mark will see are some innocent files. The Department of Defense has recently handled this threat by forbidding anyone from using a thumb drive on a military PC. The military networks are equipped with software that detects a thumb drive, refuses to connect with it, and alerts the security people. This protection is not perfect, but it's a big improvement.

But it gets worse. A pretty girl just coming up to a guy and asking for his password, works more frequently than you imagine. Mostly you have to worry about less personal, or in-your-face techniques. Carefully prepared emails (with virus attached) and addressed, by name, to the recipient, would have fooled many recipients, because they were personalized, and this helped prevent network defenses from detecting the true nature of these messages. These targeted emails from hackers were very successful. If the recipient tried to open the attached file, their computer who have hacking software secretly installed. This software would basically give the hacker control of that PC, making it possible to monitor what the user does on the computer, and have access to whatever is on that machine.

While many recipients sense that the "spear fishing" (or "phishing") attack is just that, some don't, and it only takes a few compromised PCs to give someone access to a lot of secret information. This would be the case even if it is home PCs that are being infected. American legislators have discovered office and personal PCs of themselves and their staffers infected.

But many other attacks are only discovered when they are over, or nearly so. The attackers are very well prepared, and usually first make probes and trial run attacks on target systems. When the attackers come in force, they don't want to be interrupted. And usually they aren't. Most government sponsored attackers use techniques similar to those employed by criminal gangs trying to get into banks, brokerages and big businesses in general. Thus it is believed that Chinese hackers try, as much as possible, to appear like just another gang of cyber criminals. But the Chinese have certain traits that appear more military than gangster.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article SPACE: Rogue Russian Satellites Gone Wild


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

MRMonett    Works On Windows   2/13/2009 7:12:36 AM
These attacks work on MS Windows, but not on Linux. There is a huge difference between these systems. Linux is much more secure than Windows. Windows defaults to executing incoming viruses in email, and autorunning EXE files on thumb drives. These viruses use Windows code which won't even run on Linux machines. The spam we get is due to Windows machines that have been compromised. It is impossible to guess how much money is lost each day due to the incredibly poor code running on Windows machines.
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       2/13/2009 10:37:25 AM
Some say that there are more attacks on Windows computers, because some 90% desktop and notebook machines (not servers) run MS Windows. There is some truth in it. General problem with Windows is that user can never shut down all the network services (programs that accept network connections). UNIX based systems can be made completely inactive on the network, if necessary.  Skillful  UNIX  sysadmin would typically shut down all the network services and then enable only those that serve the purpose of the particular computer. For example, if the machine is a web server, there is, probably, no need to run mail service .  Then, sysadmin  could ignore the  potential vulnerabilities of services that are not needed and divert all efforts to make necessary services safe and secure. 

Probably the safest and most secure solution are "dumb" workstations ("thin clients") that boot from the server. Sun Ray thin clients, for example, do not even run software on their own, but just provide display and keyboard for programs running on servers. One Sun Ray server can serve about 100 such workstations. User can even start session on one workstation, and continue working on another station without interrupting the session. Users can run Sun Solaris, Linux and Microsoft Windows sessions on client side. I am not sure, but server seems to use some virtualization technology to run server part of the session.
 
DG
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       2/13/2009 4:35:15 PM
The PLA uses a homemade version of Red Hat Linux called Red Flag, so UNIX attacks should be entirely possible.
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       2/13/2009 10:05:31 PM

The PLA uses a homemade version of Red Hat Linux called Red Flag, so UNIX attacks should be entirely possible.

You are talking about, so called, "security by obscurity". That means that intruders may not be able to attack the system because they don't know it's internals. It is not a true security, because, when intruders gain  knowledge, there is nothing to stop them. True  security is when intruders are not able to attack the system with  or without  knowledge of the  internals.
 
I have no doubt that PLA has knowledge of all major operating systems, database  engines and server applications.  Only thing that can stop them are truly secure  systems.  That is not enough, because, there exists  social engineering, mentioned in the article. If the users are somehow tricked  into revealing their  passwords, security is defeated.
 
As for email viruses, I remember when my mother started to use a computer. She has received an email containing a virus, clicked mouse on attachment, and PC was infected. I asked her why she, despite my warning, clicked the attachment. She replied that the attachment didn't look like a virus. I asked her how does the virus look like, in her opinion. She sad that she had no idea..... What to say ?
 
DG

 
 
Quote    Reply

sjdoc       2/14/2009 8:12:15 AM
--
Trenchantly writes trenchsol [about using Linux instead of the Windows operating system because of the former's supposedly superior intrinsic security characteristics]:
 
"You are talking about, so called, 'security by obscurity'. That means that intruders may not be able to attack the system because they don't know it's internals. It is not a true security, because, when intruders gain  knowledge, there is nothing to stop them. True  security is when intruders are not able to attack the system with  or without  knowledge of the  internals."
 
 
Agreed. Besides that, there's the massive inertia that cushions Microsoft's position in the world computer market.  No matter how great the contempt in which sophisticated computer people hold Windows in its various permutations, the system's accessibility to the average user (and the availability of programs with which to do things that the low-knowledge user wants to do) is such that conversion to another operating system is as unlikely as the conversion of our Affirmative Action President to the Austrian School of economics.
 
Instead of incessantly attacking the people in Redmond over "monopoly" issues, consider that our Public Servants in government (Mencken's "Malevolent Jobholder") might ask - pretty please - that the copycat corporate pirates of Microsoft who got their start by ripping off Xerox PARC incorporate in their updates those profoundly useful safety features found in Linux so that developers outside Microsquish can design protection software suites to take similar advantage thereof.
 
Gates and his co-conspirators can Do Well by Doing Good, especially if they're made reasonably confident that by doing so they will get the elected and bureaucratic mamzeren off their back.
 
--
 
Quote    Reply

matisse    Cuba switching to GNU/Linux, other open source Unix variants available   2/14/2009 12:28:08 PM
The government of Cuba seems to be switching to a GNU/Linux variant. Here a link to the Reuters story:  link
 
Besides GNU/Linux there are a number of open source Unix variants available including (but not limited to) Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Darwin
 
The US military probably uses all of those somewhere, although certainly in far fewer numbers than Windows variants.

I believe that currently Apple's Mac computers are by far the most common desktop hardware to actually ship to the customer with Unix pre-installed (Unix is basis of the operating system on every Mac, and iPhone and iPod touch for that matter.)
 

 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol    Richard Stallman ???   2/15/2009 12:00:02 AM

The government of Cuba seems to be switching to a GNU/Linux variant. Here a link to the Reuters story:  link target="_blank">link
Yes, thanks to guy named Richard Stallman, who visited Cuba often during last two years. It is good for Cuban citizens to be able to access Internet, communist regime will not be able to sustain information blockade. But, why US citizen has to be the one to help them ? Check his website "http://stallman.org", judge for yourself.  The site is full of advices, which are useful if one does exactly opposite.
 
DG
 
 
Quote    Reply

matisse       2/16/2009 2:20:04 AM

Yes, thanks to guy named Richard Stallman ...
Stallman is rather well known in the Open Source world. He founded the Free Software Foundation and has been a huge contributor to open source software for decades. Stallman is dedicated to software that is "free as in freedom" - that is software that gives the user the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. There is often controversy about which software license are "truly free."
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy