NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Electronic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Military Modders Gone Mad

January 21, 2009: The U.S. Army has decided that hummers need a cockpit design. Sounds strange, but not when you realize what dashboards in many hummers already look like. In addition to the usual vehicle instruments, the dashboard usually has added to it controls and displays for jammers (to defeat IEDs), GPS navigation device (the map display), a Blue Force Tracker display (to show where all nearby vehicles are, via a satellite based system) and whatever else resourceful troops add. These include a rear view cam (rigging a lipstick size cam facing to the rear and putting the image on a display place on the dashboard). Some of the troops are modders (those who modify electronic equipment), and they add a laptop, which can provide other data, or video from a nearby UAV (or a small one, like the Raven, launched by nearby troops.) Sometimes there are also controls for combat robots, used to check out possible roadside bombs, or to stand guard duty.

The problem, these tricked out dashboards all arrange their extra gadgets differently. The army wants to standardize it, so you know what you are dealing with, and where it is, as soon as you jump into the front seat of some fully loaded vehicle. The army has built prototype truck cockpits that combine many different electronic display type devices into fewer displays, and saves a lot of space and weight. Soldiers have been testing the prototypes, and providing feedback to the developers.

The new cockpits borrow much from their aircraft counterparts, including helmets with the ability to make a robot, or camera mounted on the top of the vehicle, move in the direction the helmet turns. Head-up displays are already available for some automobiles, and this is another concept the army is looking at. The cockpit, like those in aircraft, is built to accommodate new technologies.

Tanks and other armored vehicles have already had their insides redesigned to seem more like a cockpit. Otherwise, there's no way the crew could handle all the equipment they have around them.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article COUNTER-TERRORISM: The Islamic Pope


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

newjarheadean    Make up our minds   1/21/2009 6:00:19 PM
AHOY, this is one of those examples of when THEY decide its a good idea, it well be spun in a way that it all makes so much sense. If some lay person in a post on the net came up with the idea, everyone would have laughed and said it would be to expensive, unnecessary etc. etc. G-day!
 
Quote    Reply

Bob Cortez       1/25/2009 4:47:02 PM
Another example of something being resolved in practice, then people not a part of the process decide they can improve it by making set of possibly ill-informed rules.  The best solution is let practice resolve the important issues, then decide later rather than sooner.  I have found that word travels quickly among those doing the work, unless there are artificial impediments.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       1/25/2009 6:05:43 PM

The best solution is let practice resolve the important issues, then decide later rather than sooner.  I have found that word travels quickly among those doing the work, unless there are artificial impediments.

It is possible to achieve both aims.  a good example is the Common Combat Centre - "look and feel" means that allies can step into the job and know exactly what to see and what to push as it mirrors their own gear - this is fundamentally a localised version of the same.  The issue in doing any of this is defining the baseline - and then the "human factors" people step in.

eg every major procurement we do has a safety and risk assessment done on it which includes "'human factors"  assessment.

the above article reinforces what we've been getting from operators anyway, I don't see why US operators  wouldn't have similar concerns (esp seeing that the CCC for example) was a US initiative - and has worked well.

 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy