NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Electronic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Smart Phones In Combat

October 10, 2008: The troops want combat ready cell phones. Simple as that. In the last decade, a generation has come of age that expects to carry around a phone, and stay connected 24/7. Their elders have also picked up on this convenience, to the point where the U.S. Army is actively trying to figure out how to make this happen.

In Afghanistan and Iraq, where widespread cell phone service followed in the wake of the American invasions, many U.S. troops have bought local cell phone service, and use these phones when on combat operations. But the troops want more out of their phones than just instant communications. Like many business users, military personnel see the many potential uses of "smart phones." These are cell phones with personal computer like power, and capabilities. About ten percent of the cell phones being shipped this year are smart phones (the iPhone and Blackberry are two of the more popular models). Smart phones are particularly popular with businesses, where most of them are used. About a third of business users let their smart phone replace their laptop at least some of the time. But many business users are pushing for smart phones powerful enough to replace their laptops a lot more often.

This is where the troops want to go. Laptops have become increasingly common on the battlefield in the past decade. But laptops, even lightweight (under five pounds) ruggedized ones are bulky and heavy. Not the kind of stuff troops like to haul around. As a practical matter, it's only company commanders and a few others (like air and artillery controllers) who use laptops under fire. But platoon leaders (and platoon sergeants) could use a smart phone with laptop capabilities. So could squad leaders, and anyone who has to drive a truck (armored vehicles already come equipped with lots of computers).

The combination of network access and laptop quality software make a military smart phone a very useful gadget. Add in the GPS, and you have something every soldier would want. What the army is looking for is a smart phone that can work off battlefield wi-fi and have sufficient encryption and ruggedness to survive enemy efforts, and general rough use, to shut it down. The army now has several decades of experience using seemingly "delicate" electronics on the battlefield. There's no fear about this anymore, especially since some troops are using cell phones in combat (although you're not supposed to).

For commanders, a military smart phone (MSP for short) has numerous advantages. First, there's the convenience of having most of your unit data literally at your finger tips. Status of troops, ammo, equipment and the inevitable todo list, as well as maps and plans for future, or past, operations. Smart phones also push data onto a phone, to keep databases and schedules updated. Commanders love that sort of thing, as it saves them the hassle of getting updates. And updates are a lot easier to collect with everyone connected. Senior NCOs can much more easily poll troops by texting them to get current status of things like ammo, sleep, food or health. Commanders like to stay on top of these items.

The army is in a hurry to get this working, because commercial smart phones are getting smarter and cheaper, and a lot more troops are getting them. Today's soldier grew up with portable electronics, and expects to find it wherever they go. While troops like stuff like personal radio sets (which came of age in Iraq), they also know that cell phones can do the same thing, and more. So the MSP would simply plug into the helmet headset. The army also has to deal with troops demand for iPod features (the most widespread "handheld computer"). The MSP would also be able to take stills and videos, and the troops like to carry favorite vids with them. Combining business and pleasure is not encouraged in the military, but the MSP will be a very personal piece of gear. It might even be able to use civilian cell networks as well, meaning that every troop will be issued one.

The army might also pick an MSP operating system, like Linux, that would make it easier for the troops to more easily write software. Then again, maybe not, given some of the dodgy stuff that has already been written for existing smart phones. In any event, the army knows they are entering new territory here. But they have to do it, before someone, somewhere else, beats them to it.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article MORALE: Combat Zone Shopping Habits


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

trenchsol       10/10/2008 8:53:56 AM
As far as I understand, laptops were carried by officers. They could be regarded as responsible persons making who take data security in account and make sure that laptop does not contain data that do not belong there. If the rank and file is given such a powerful data storage as modern cell phone is, some of them might store unappropriate information in it.  There is no problem finding an encrypted file system for laptop, in fact modern operating system are supporting them out of the box, and even more sophisticated could be added. I have not heard of anything like that for cell phones, which might be due to a fact that I am much more into computers than cellphones.
 
DG


 
Quote    Reply

colforbin       10/10/2008 10:31:13 AM
go linux!
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle       10/14/2008 3:36:11 PM
Many of the things mentioned in the article pertain mainly to applications that really have limited relationship with the functionality of a phone or radio per se; to communicate information.  A radio or phone interrelates with the application in so much as the device has the power and band width to support the desired applications.  I consider a phone, wirelelss or not, to depend on the presence of a fixed infrastructure to support its functionality whereas a set of pure radios may communicate between themselves independent of a infrastructure.   A phone often has to trade off power in order to achieve greater bandwidth to satisfy applications but therefor has to make the application less mobile in order to stay close to the supporting infrastructure (which itself can have limited mobility) but the phone can be much simpler ($) because of the services provided by the infrastructure to the phone.  Radios can have the power, band width, and network heaped on top of them at the cost of complexity and exspense but enable the user with operational flexability.  
Presently there are many hybrid solutions which have different sizes and shapes of network and transport layers heaped upon them in order to acquire different performance criteria.  In my opinion thou one size doesn't and can't fit all requirements.  There has to be, IMHO, a decision made about what overlapping requirements are needed where. 
 
Quote    Reply

hiker    NSA smart phone   12/26/2008 11:11:40 PM
  link
 
 
A new mobile phone specifically designed for the National Security Agency looks like any other commercial smart phone, with a decent-size screen for Web browsing and a full keyboard for data entry.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy