NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



NBC Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

The Saudi Nuke

NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS

June 6, 2009: The United States believes that Pakistan has 60 nuclear weapons, and is producing nuclear material for at least 5-6 more bombs a year. The U.S. has provided money and technical assistance to ensure the security of those weapons. It is believed that Pakistan stores its nukes with the nuclear material kept separate from the rest of the weapon (which contains the explosives that compress the enriched uranium, causing the nuclear explosion, as well as the electronics and warhead components needed to trigger the explosion.)

Pakistan built its nuclear weapons in order to guarantee its independence from Indian attack, invasion and conquest. India has no interest in conquering Pakistan. That would nearly double the number of Moslems in India, as well as adding an area that has a lot more poverty and corruption. Then there are the Pakistani tribal territories, with over 20 million tribal people who have, for thousands of years, raided into, and occasionally invaded, India. Pakistanis are coming to accept this Indian attitude as true, and for the last five years, the two countries have been negotiating to settle the territorial and political differences that have caused decades of violence (and four wars) between the two nations. Most people, on both sides of the border, agree that a nuclear war would be a tragic disaster for both nations, insuring that neither could claim "victory" with a straight face.

Pakistan denies that it is expanding its nuclear arsenal, but U.S. intelligence (and their Indian counterparts) believe otherwise. Sixty weapons should be sufficient to maintain the "balance of terror" with India. What no one wants to discuss openly is the risk of Pakistan selling its "surplus" of nukes to another country. Pakistan certainly needs the money, and already has a track record of peddling nuclear weapons technology. The UN IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) continues investigating Pakistani nuclear weapons scientist A Q Khan's illegal nuclear weapons technology smuggling organization. IAEA believes that Khan's group not only had a wider reach than previously thought, but is still in business.

Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West and created Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea). Khan was placed under house arrest after he confessed, and kept away from journalists, but was otherwise untouchable, because he was a national hero for creating the "Islamic Bomb." Popular demand eventually led to Khan being released from house arrest last year.

The IAEA continues to question Khan's customers, some of whom (particularly Libya) have been very cooperative. It is now known, for example, that most of the nuclear weapons documents provided were in electronic form. Thus the information could be easily copied and distributed. There's no way to track down how many copies there are or who has them. It is known that the documents are not in wide distribution, but it is likely that someone (especially in Iran and North Korea) has copies. But there are indications that the documents are still on the market.

A prime customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article WARPLANES: Armed Crop Dusters Go To War


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Chris       6/6/2009 11:19:15 AM
Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West and created Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea).
 
Pakistan was selling nuclear technology on the black market before the 1990's (during the Reagan years).  But it became known to the US during the Bush (#41) years (i..e. 1989).  The administration of GHW Bush was considering selling F-16 fighter planes to Pakistan, when it was reported (to Sec Def Dick Cheney, who was responsible for overseeing the sale) by both the DIA and CIA, that Pakistan had been selling nuclear technologies on the black market, just before the sale was to be approved.  Ultimately, they decided to not disclose that information to congress because otherwise the sale never would have been permitted.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       6/7/2009 5:59:23 AM
Given the 600 million murders over the last 1,000 years the question this article misses with it's conquest and absorption of Muslims is what many Indians are voicing: "Why not kill Pakistan?" Though India would need some non-radiactive WMDs and more conventional weapons for that. The land leftover could be left alone or reclaimed as historically Indian.
 
I realize this is cold and I do not support it myself, but I would if I was an Indian.
 
Quote    Reply

SAE       6/7/2009 10:11:43 AM
My Comments: Now you see the fallout of allowing the Iranians to get the bomb. When Iran gets the bomb, all their neighbors are in danger of a nuclear attack if they do not quickly acquire a nuclear weapon to counter it. Remember, Israel already has nuclear weapons and can defend itself. It is the other countries in the Middle East that are going to be hung out to dry. This danger of proliferation is the reason the last administration was so adamant about stopping North Korea and Iran from getting the bomb in the first place. But now we got a administration that just does not care and we are going to see a wave of countries acquiring nuclear weapons because of it, starting with Saudi Arabia. 
 
Obama  and his  "Peace For Our Time" speech in Cairo appears to be becoming the Neville Chamberlain of our time.  What is troubling about his Cairo speech, in addition, to his anti-Semitic policies toward Israel, is his abandonment of our nonproliferation policy against rouge nations. He has already allowed North Korea to get the Bomb. Then, he states on BBC that Iran has the right to a nuclear program and finally in his Cairo speech he saids that "No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons." History suggests that Obama's appeasement policy will, in the long run, have the same result as Chamberlain's policy did - a war. This time between countries, which have nuclear weapons.
 
Quote    Reply

benellim4       6/7/2009 9:06:43 PM

Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West and created Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea).

 

Pakistan was selling nuclear technology on the black market before the 1990's (during the Reagan years).  But it became known to the US during the Bush (#41) years (i..e. 1989).  The administration of GHW Bush was considering selling F-16 fighter planes to Pakistan, when it was reported (to Sec Def Dick Cheney, who was responsible for overseeing the sale) by both the DIA and CIA, that Pakistan had been selling nuclear technologies on the black market, just before the sale was to be approved.  Ultimately, they decided to not disclose that information to congress because otherwise the sale never would have been permitted.

 

 

Some revisionist history going on here. In 1990 the sale of F-16s to Pakistan was blocked due to the nuclear proliferation concerns. The sale was approved finally in 2005. The first four aircraft were delivered in June of 2008.
 
Quote    Reply

kirby1       6/12/2009 11:35:20 PM
The guy was released due to popular demand?
 
*Grumble grumble  "Accidents happen." grumble grumble grumble*
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy