NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



NBC Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

No Chlorine In A Time Of Cholera

NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS

 

November 19, 2007: Apparently the recent cholera outbreaks, in some parts of Iraq, have been caused by a breakdown of already decrepit water and sewage treatment facilities. It hasn't helped that the supplies of chlorine have been subject to tighter controls due to a couple of terrorist attempts at improvising chemical weapons from chlorine (otherwise intended for water and sewage treatment.) This type of problem is likely to occur again in situations where terrorists try to improvise chemical weapons using chemicals normally employed  in common sanitary and commercial processes. Investing in R&D to develop alternative, non-weaponizable chemicals might be of use.

 

The Iraqi terrorists have stopped using chlorine in their bombs, largely because it wasn't very effective. For all the fear chemical weapons inspire, they are actually rather poor at inflicting lots of casualties. Military professionals dislike chemical weapons mainly because they terrorize more than injure, and that terror leads to breakdowns in discipline and much more difficulty in carrying out operations. In Iraq, the terrorists killed more people, indirectly, with the cholera resulting from a shortage of chlorine for producing clean water, than with the "chlorine bombs" themselves. Indeed, the terrorist attacks against water treatment plants have been, in terms of people killed or made very ill, one of their more effective tactics.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article INDIA-PAKISTAN: More Smoke Than Fire


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

WarNerd       12/23/2007 2:33:49 PM
They should look into systems that allow them to generate needed chemicals on site on an as needed basis.
 
They also need to look at alternate treatment technologies.  Ozone, for example, is effective against many diseases that are not effected by chlorine.
 
Sometimes we seem as tradition bound as the Islamic conservatives.
 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       12/23/2007 8:05:17 PM

They should look into systems that allow them to generate needed chemicals on site on an as needed basis.

 

They also need to look at alternate treatment technologies.  Ozone, for example, is effective against many diseases that are not effected by chlorine.

 

Sometimes we seem as tradition bound as the Islamic conservatives.

 
The problem with Ozone is that it is more dangerous than Chlorine, while it's toxicity to humans is slightly lower, it is a very unstable and explosive substance. Though I agree with the on site production, similar to what they do when phosgene is required for a chemical process. NaOH will practically kill any thing in the water, why not use that? Same goes with hypochlorites, though in high concentrations these too are rather unstable.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy