Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Artillery: Israel Replaces 155mm Guns With Smart Rockets
   Next Article → PHILIPPINES: China Demands Fear
February 13, 2012: Israel has decided to replace its four decade old M109 155mm self-propelled armored artillery vehicles with guided rockets. This comes a year after deciding that the M109s could not be refurbished and upgraded anymore and would have to be replaced. At first, other artillery systems were examined. But then it was remembered that two years ago Israel had accepted that the U.S. use of GPS guidance in rockets, while more expensive, was more effective than the cheaper (but less accurate) Israeli developed rocket guidance system and even cheaper unguided artillery shells. So now the M109s are being replaced with guided rockets.

This radical shift in artillery weapons has been coming since the 2006 war with Hezbollah, when the Israelis found that they did little damage to Hezbollah bunkers, even though over 120,000 unguided 155mm shells were fired (mostly by M109 guns) at them. Meanwhile, they noted that the U.S. 227mm MLRS rockets with GPS guidance was excellent at taking out similar targets in Iraq and Afghanistan. So Israel equipped its 160mm Accular rockets with GPS. These 110 kg (242 pound) rockets have a range of 40 kilometers and enable one bunker to be destroyed with one rocket.

This was a big change. Up until Israel adopted GPS guidance for rockets they had used cheaper, but less accurate, systems for their rockets. The main effort here was the Trajectory Correction System (TCS), which was installed in U.S. 227mm MLRS unguided rockets as well as Israeli 160mm rockets. TCS used rockets equipped with a guidance system and radio. The ground portion of TCS consists of a control unit that tracks the position of the rockets in flight, calculates where they will land, and sends orders to the guidance system (small vanes) in the rocket. This makes the rockets as accurate as unguided artillery shells. TCS is cheaper than GPS guided rockets. Israel bought 48 MLRS launchers in the 1990s, but has mostly used them to fire unguided rockets.

Israel always recognized the superiority of GPS in some situations. For example, Israel developed LORA (Long Range Artillery Rocket) which is similar to the U.S. ATACMS. Each LORA missile weighs 1.23 tons and carries a half ton warhead. With a range of 300 kilometers, GPS guidance is used to land the warhead within 10 meters (31 feet) of the aim point. These missiles are expensive. The similar U.S. ATACMS, which is fired from a MLRS container that normally carries six of the standard MLRS rockets, cost a million dollars each. It's often a lot cheaper if you can use smart bombs (which cost less than $50,000). But if you don't have aircraft up there, or control of the air is contested, you can get a LORA missile on a target within ten minutes of the order being given.

Israel expects to replace a lot of artillery shells, air delivered missiles, and bombs with its GPS guided rockets and take out more targets with far fewer rockets and artillery shells.

Next Article → PHILIPPINES: China Demands Fear

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Tucci78    What to do with all those ''defrocked'' M109s?   2/13/2012 4:30:40 PM
The Israelis have a reputation for never letting a tracked vehicle chassis go to waste.
Once the howitzers and other gear is removed from the majority of the M109 systems in the IDF inventory, to what use will those vehicles be put?
During World War II, among the first fully-tracked armored personnel carriers (APCs) to appear on the battlefield were self-propelled gun systems like the U.S. M7 "Priest" (the nickname given by the British, who took a number of these American 105mm armored motorized gun carriages into service pending the availability of the "Sexton," which mounted their own 25-pounder). 
The British "defrocked" a number of M7 systems by removing their 105mm gun/howitzers and -voila - they had APCs. 
The Israelis already have the infrastructure - spare parts inventories, trained mechanics and drivers - to keep the M109 chassis operational, and - as mentioned - they have a "waste not, want not" mentality.  Their mobile missile launchers are going to need field logistical back-up, aren't they? 
Quote    Reply

Shirrush    BS!   2/13/2012 5:07:01 PM
This is simply not true. While IMI... is manufacturing rocket artillery systems and selling them to some undemocratic and gung-ho Central Asian oil countries, no decision has been made by the IDF to procure any of their crap. The M109 soldiers on, mostly with the very same barrels they had in Vietnam, and achieves results made infamous in the Summer of 2006. Since the artillery corps is at the lowest rung of the ground forces' pecking order, this matters little. This will matter when the Commission of Inquiry for the next war convenes, to which the IDF will have to explain why the guns couldn't shoot straight, why the Air Force needed to be used as an arty substitute just like in '73 once again, and why they made the decision to select the easily-denied, foreign-controlled GPS for their rockets' guidance, if any are purchased till then.

Quote    Reply

wastral       2/14/2012 5:02:50 AM
GPS is cool as long as the opposition are technological idiots.  Even the North Koreans are smart enough to develop a simple arc white noise transmitter capable of blocking all GPS signals for 50 miles.  They blanked out Seoul S. Korea back in 2004 I believe. Whenever the USA Secretary of State was over there, forget the exact year. 
Said rockets better have pretty good INS back up.  
Quote    Reply