Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Artillery: ATACMS Aimed At China
   Next Article → ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Three Eyed Eagle
January 1, 2011: Taiwan is buying about a hundred MGM140 ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile Systems) artillery rockets from the United States. Taiwan does not have the M270 MLRS rocket launchers, which the ATACMS is launched from. Instead, Taiwan built its own, and much cheaper, version of MLRS; the RT2000. This system is close enough in size to MLRS that the ATACMS canister (for transport, storage and firing) will fit.

Taiwan is getting the ATACMS equipped with a 227 kg (500 pound) high explosive warhead. The U.S. used over 700 ATACMS in Iraq and Afghanistan. These rockets use GPS guidance to hit targets up to 300 kilometers away. Sort of like the popular 500 pound JDAM smart bomb used by the air force, but not requiring an aircraft to deliver it.

When the U.S. Army first introduced its long range ATACMS rocket 24 years ago, it designed fancy warheads that distributed lots of smaller bomblets. While these worked, there was always a problem with some of the bomblets not self-destructing, and later going off when civilians, or American troops, came along. Not a popular weapon. Then, when a version, with GPS guidance and a single, 500 pound high explosive (or "unitary") warhead was introduced, it proved very popular. These rockets cost about a million dollars each. A 500 pound JDAM costs about $28,000, although you can add a few thousand dollars more to cover the expense of operating the jet bomber that delivered it.

The ATACMS is a 610mm rocket that fits in the same size container that normally holds six 227mm MLRS rockets. It has sufficient range to reach Chinese coastal targets.



Next Article → ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Three Eyed Eagle

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
df21d    Is this confirmed ???   1/3/2011 8:04:08 PM
Has Strategypage confirmed this sale from a U.S. government source?  Taiwan govt. sources are denying it.  The 12/23 DoD announcement contains no mention of ATACMS.  But apparently, that did not stop Defense Industry Daily, Daegel, Defense Update and the Chinese Department of Propaganda from claiming that it is so.  As justified as it may be, long held State Department policies are not consistent with an ATACMS sale to Taiwan.  Please clarify. 

Quote    Reply