Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Artillery: Third Attempt To Replace The M-109
   Next Article → ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Troops Prefer Radio Shack
April 22, 2010: Last year, the U.S. Army cancelled its second attempt (the XM1203 NLOS-C) to replace the half-century old M-109 self-propelled 155mm howitzer. The third attempts will consist of the PIM (Paladin Integrated Management program). That means the army is going to rebuild many of its existing 900 M109 Paladin self-propelled 155mm howitzers, rather than trying to come up with another new design. PIM will use the same chassis as the M-2 Bradley infantry vehicle, and a new engine control system. Added to that will be the cab and gun mounts from the Paladin. From the XM1203, the automatic rammer, but not the automatic loader, will be used. So troops will still have to manually load the propellant and 90 pound shell, but the semi-automatic rammer will then push the propellant and shell into the firing chamber and close the breech. Automating this part of the process improves accuracy somewhat, because when troops manually shoved (rammed) in the propellant and shell, they often applied too much, or too little, pressure and left the shell out of position by a tiny bit, just enough to hurt accuracy. PIM will get new electronics, and numerous small improvements, many based on user suggestions.

The NLOS-C was to have been the first of the eight MGV (Manned Ground Vehicle) systems to enter service this year as part of the FCS (Future Combat System) program. But the FCS lost its focus, budget discipline and Congressional support. It was cancelled last year.

Seven years ago, the prototype NLOS-C was cobbled together in six months, after the new (and very high tech and high priced) Crusader SP artillery system was cancelled. The 45 ton Crusader used an autoloader and an engine similar to the one used in the M-1 tank. It was deemed too heavy and too expensive, and in 2002 it was cancelled. The NLOS-C used the Crusader autoloader and some of its electronic components.

The current self-propelled system, the M-109, is a fifty year old design. Although the M-109 has been frequently updated, the NLOS-C incorporated many more new technologies. This included an auto-loader (from the Crusader) and a more modern 155mm gun and an APC chassis with a hybrid-electric engine (to reduce fuel consumption.) This all weighed 23 tons, about the same as the M-109. But the NLOS only had a two man crew, compared to five in the M-109.

The final version of the NLOS-C was to be heavier (about 27 tons), because more defensive systems were added, to reflect experience in Iraq. The NLOC-C also got a lot of new electronics. The vehicle carried 24 rounds of 155mm ammo. Congress originally demanded that NLOS-C be in service by 2008, but development needed a few more years. Field testing (operating as one would in combat), began two years ago with the six prototypes.

One problem the brass were concerned about was the ability of the two man crew to hold up during 24/7 operations. The M-109, with a five man crew, has enough people to take care of maintenance, standing guard and, basically, always having one or two people rested and alert. Not so easy when you only have two guys. One solution was to have two or more crews per vehicle, as combat aircraft (and some warships) have done for years. The off-duty crews would be back with the support troops. PIM will have a crew of four, compared to five in the Paladin M-109 and two in the XM1203.

One of the things that helped kill the NLOS-C was the new GPS guided Excalibur shell. The Excalibur shell entered service two years ago, and changed everything. Excalibur has worked very well in combat, and this is radically changing the way artillery operates. Excalibur means 80-90 percent less ammo has to be fired, meaning less wear and tear on SP artillery like NLOS-C or PIM (and less time needed for maintenance), and less time replenishing ammo supplies, and more time being ready for action.

In the current war on terror, even the M-109 has not been used much. The lighter, towed, M777 has proved more useful, especially when using the Excalibur shell. Currently, the army plans to keep PIM versions of the M-109 around until 2050. The M-109 was a solid design, which is pretty clear from how difficult it's been to come up with a replacement. So, in the end, the army replaced the M-109 with another M-109 upgrade.

The first PIM prototypes will begin field testing in a few months. The army plans to acquire at least 400 PIMs, reflecting the impact of the Excalibur shell, and the number of older M-109s that are still fit for service.



Next Article → ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Troops Prefer Radio Shack

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
tanker135    M109 Rammer   4/22/2010 6:52:22 PM
The M109 has always had a power rammer. The first models were cab-mounted (and very difficult to use), but by the mid-70's the rammers were mounted under the breach and you pulled it out from there and positioned the tray behind the breach when reloading. Crews only used the rammer staff when the power rammer was inoperative, which (at least in the 70's when I was in a Cav Howitzer Battery) was a fairly rare occurrence, at least as long as you timed it properly. You could really frighten the Chief of Firing Battery as he was laying the battery (using the aiming circle to align the guns) when the first round from base piece left the tube and had not been fully rammed!
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       4/26/2010 10:09:10 PM
That sounds fun ^^
Quote    Reply

mabie       5/20/2010 11:20:39 AM
PIMS appears to be a pragmatic and sensible approach that integrates a number of proven components to enhance the overall effectiveness of the M-109. It may not have all the bells and whistles of a completely new design but it should be more than capable of getting the job done at a lower cost. Reducing the manpower requirements by 20% is an added bonus.
Quote    Reply

logger       5/24/2010 3:53:14 PM
I was in an 8" Self Propelled Atrillery Battery in Vietnam (68-69).  Our shells weighed 200 pounds and were hand carried to the loader/rammer behind the gun.  The loader lifted them up on the vehicle, layed them in the tray, then rammed them in the tube.  If you want to knock down the Chief of Smoke after laying the battery, just accidently drop the powder bag in the swab bucket before loading it behind the round.  We used to occasionally call out the commands as, "Charge Seven, Wet Bag", expecially when we shot at night over the Bird Colonel from the 101st Infantry that harrassed us on "his base".  Ahhh, the good old days......
Quote    Reply