Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Artillery: Iskander. Iskander Everywhere
   Next Article → COUNTER-TERRORISM: FBI Seeks Midwest Bomb Builders

November 14, 2008: For the second time this month, Russia has changed its policy regarding its new SS-26 (9M723K1, or "Iskander") ballistic missiles. First it said it was sending some to Kaliningrad, as a way to threaten the new NATO anti-missile system being built in Poland (to protect Europe from Iranian missiles). Now Russia says it will halt any exports of the Iskander missile until it has produced the hundred or so it plans to send to Kaliningrad. Syria, Kuwait, South Korea, India, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates were all interested in Iskander. The export version, Iskander-E, would have a shorter range (280 kilometers) and fewer countermeasures for the warhead.

Russia now plans to send five brigades of Iskander (60 launchers, each with one missile, plus reloads, which could amount to over a hundred missiles) to Kaliningrad. Iskander is just entering production, and it would take several years, at least, to produce that many. Actually, it might take five or more years to produce enough missiles for five brigades, because Russian missile production capabilities have sharply deteriorated since the end of the Cold War in 1991. This is one reason why the current Russian government is making so much noise about this imaginary NATO plot to surround and subdue Russia. Losing the Cold War did not go down well in Russia. Rather than forget and move on, many Russians prefer to remember, and use the imagined evil intentions of their Cold War foes to explain away defects in the Russian character.

This Russian deployment to Kaliningrad is all about a unique feature of Iskander, which is that it is not a traditional ballistic missile. That is, it does not fire straight up, leave the atmosphere, then come back down, following a ballistic trajectory. Instead, Iskander stays in the atmosphere and follows a rather flat trajectory. It is capable of evasive maneuvers and deploying decoys. This makes it more difficult for anti-missile systems to take it down. Russia is buying a special version of the Iskanders for its own military. This version has a longer range (500 kilometers) and more countermeasures (to interception). Russia will not provide details. Russia has admitted that it could use Iskander to destroy the U.S. anti-missile systems in a pre-emptive attack. Just in case Russia wanted to start World War III for some reason or another. This Iskander deployment is mainly a publicity stunt, unless you want to seriously consider the possibility that the Russians are trying to start a nuclear war.

Kaliningrad is the perfect place for Russia to start World War III. The city is the former German city of Konisgberg, which was captured at the end of World War II, and kept by Russia, as the boundaries of Eastern Europe were rearranged in the late 1940s. Until 1991, Kaliningrad was on the Soviet Union's western border. But when the Soviet Union dissolved that year, and more than half the Soviet Union split away to regain their independence as 14 new nations, Kaliningrad found itself nestled between Poland and the newly reestablished Lithuania. The small (200 square kilometers, 400,000 Russians, the Germans were expelled 60 years ago) city is still the headquarters of the Russian Baltic fleet and protected by a large force of troops and warplanes. The Iskander missiles will feel right at home.

The Iskander finally completed its development in the last few years. The 3.8 ton missile has a range of 280-500 kilometers, and a 900 pound warhead. Russia sells several different types of warheads, including cluster munitions, thermobaric (fuel-air explosive) and electro-magnetic pulse (anti-radar, and destructive to electronics in general.) There is also a nuclear warhead, which is not exported. Guidance is very accurate, using GPS, plus infrared homing for terminal guidance. The warhead will land within 30 feet of the aim point. Iskanders are carried in a 20 ton 8x8 truck, which also provides a launch platform. There is also a reload truck that carries two missiles.

Russia developed the solid fuel Iskander to replace its Cold War era SS-23 battlefield ballistic missiles (which in turn had replaced SCUD). The SS-23 had to be withdrawn from service and destroyed by 1991, because the 1987 Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty prohibited missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,300 kilometers. When post Cold War financial problems slowed down development of Iskander, this left Russia dependent on the shorter range (120 kilometers) SS-21 system, along with some aging SCUDS, for battlefield ballistic missile support. Russia used some of these older missiles against Chechen rebels in the 1990s.

 

Next Article → COUNTER-TERRORISM: FBI Seeks Midwest Bomb Builders
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
razputin       11/14/2008 2:12:51 PM
Threatening placing iskanders in Kaliningrad and then withdrawing that threat is no more than a pressure tactic for the ongoing Russia-EU summit. Nothing more nothing less. Then again what is really silly is claiming that the supposed missile shield  in Poland is for protection against Iranian ballistic missiles:))) I'm sure american military planners' knowledge of geography is much better than that of the rest of americans. They should know better that the location for such a site would make a lot more sense in Turkey or even Romania. 
 
Quote    Reply

razputin       11/14/2008 5:14:08 PM
 
Quote    Reply

jak267       11/14/2008 6:47:28 PM
Since when are offensive missiles a PR stunt? They are coercing both Eastern and Western Europe - and OBie won't do a thing. Russia wins Cold War.
 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       11/14/2008 10:10:32 PM

Since when are offensive missiles a PR stunt? They are coercing both Eastern and Western Europe - and OBie won't do a thing. Russia wins Cold War.



When the missiles in question don't physically exisit, they are nothing more than a PR sunt.
 
Quote    Reply

razputin       11/17/2008 3:52:49 PM



Since when are offensive missiles a PR stunt? They are coercing both Eastern and Western Europe - and OBie won't do a thing. Russia wins Cold War.








When the missiles in question don't physically exisit, they are nothing more than a PR sunt.

PR and pressure tactics during negotiations are not exactly the same thing. But you keep on telling yourself that they don't exist and maybe they will disappear))
 
Quote    Reply

mough       11/19/2008 2:46:52 AM







Since when are offensive missiles a PR stunt? They are coercing both Eastern and Western Europe - and OBie won't do a thing. Russia wins Cold War.


















When the missiles in question don't physically exisit, they are nothing more than a PR sunt.





PR and pressure tactics during negotiations are not exactly the same thing. But you keep on telling yourself that they don't exist and maybe they will disappear))

But they don't exist, the Russian's have been saying for year's that they will start building them "soon"...but "soon" never seems to come, those same 5 Brigades of launchers were supposed to be in service what 5 years ago now? at least....

 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357       11/19/2008 3:29:32 AM

Threatening placing iskanders in Kaliningrad and then withdrawing that threat is no more than a pressure tactic for the ongoing Russia-EU summit. Nothing more nothing less. Then again what is really silly is claiming that the supposed missile shield  in Poland is for protection against Iranian ballistic missiles:))) I'm sure american military planners' knowledge of geography is much better than that of the rest of americans. They should know better that the location for such a site would make a lot more sense in Turkey or even Romania. 

Read a globe instead of a map. Some of us "civilians" do understand orbital mechanics and sidereal drift introduced by planetary rotation and what that means for exo-atmospheric interception. I deal in DATE cycles sometimes. It also amazes me to see that the Russians place so much hope in Iskander. Its not that good a rocket being a souped SCUD with swome aerodynamic tricks and a few flake off decoys..
 
Herald
 
 
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

razputin       11/20/2008 10:52:58 AM



Threatening placing iskanders in Kaliningrad and then withdrawing that threat is no more than a pressure tactic for the ongoing Russia-EU summit. Nothing more nothing less. Then again what is really silly is claiming that the supposed missile shield  in Poland is for protection against Iranian ballistic missiles:))) I'm sure american military planners' knowledge of geography is much better than that of the rest of americans. They should know better that the location for such a site would make a lot more sense in Turkey or even Romania. 




Read a globe instead of a map. Some of us "civilians" do understand orbital mechanics and sidereal drift introduced by planetary rotation and what that means for exo-atmospheric interception. I deal in DATE cycles sometimes. It also amazes me to see that the Russians place so much hope in Iskander. Its not that good a rocket being a souped SCUD with swome aerodynamic tricks and a few flake off decoys..

 

Herald

You are right. The issue really is about Poland having a US military base on the border with Belarus. That means Russia cannot effectively threaten a military invasion in Poland without engaging US military. And no one really places so much hope in Iskanders. They are more of a scarecrow.  It is like saying to Polaks "if you let the missile shield to be palced on yout territory you might get nuked. Do you want that? Do you now?"

 
Quote    Reply