NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Bradley 2.0

October 8, 2009: The U.S. Army plans to keep its M-2 (Bradley) IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) for another twenty years. To do that, it wants to upgrade thousands of them to "Block II" status. There are already 600 "Block 1.5" (BUSK) upgrades. These are the M-2s modified for urban warfare, based on Iraq experience.

The M-2 BUSK (Bradley Urban Survival Kit) upgrades were applied in two batches over the last few years (the program ended in 2008). The first included a more powerful (at 3 million candlepower, four times brighter) spotlight. There was also a wire mesh protector to keep the optics from getting scratched, and non-conductive rods that push away fallen electrical wires that often endanger crews. Later came a remote control (CLAW) 5.56mm machine-gun on the turret, additional armor underneath to provide protection from mines and a bullet proof, and a transparent shield for the commander when his head and shoulders are out of the turret.

Some non-urban warfare improvements were also made, including a series of sensors and a software package that more quickly found components that were wearing out (so replacements could be ordered and installed), and simulation software so the gunner could train (with the fire control system, in effect, turned into a realistic video game.) All this added about three tons to the weight of the vehicle, making the M2 a 30 ton vehicle (about what most World War II tanks weighed).

The Block 2 is planned as a major upgrade of the M-2. It will include a more powerful (800 versus 600 horsepower) engine, a more powerful gun (30 or 40mm) and lighter armor (or protection systems that shoot down anti-tank missiles and RPGs). Improved sensors are planned, plus vidcams to give people inside the vehicle a 360 degree view of what's outside.) More electronics, including one that would allow variable power, and fuel consumption, from the engine. More safety features are planned as well, including an improved fire extinguisher system. For better protection against mines and roadside bombs, the body of the vehicle would be 18 (46 cm) inches off the ground, instead of the current 11. With more armor on the floor, and seats that absorb some of the blast, the Block 2 would have protection approaching that of an MRAP. New fuel tanks would be less prone to causing fires (using protection similar to that found in aircraft fuel tanks). There would be dozens of more minor improvements, based on user feedback. The Block 2 M2 would probably weigh about 35 tons, making it heavier than most World War II tanks (late model T-34s and M-4s).

The new version is not expected to show up for another 4-5 years. These upgrades represent a belief that the M-2 is an excellent, combat proven vehicle worth keeping around for a while. Over 4,000 M-2s were built, and about 2,300 similar M-3s (a recon version with more gear and fewer passengers). It's unclear how many would be upgraded.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Chinese Carrier AWACS


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

kryten10    Bradley technology demonstrator   10/8/2009 7:35:19 AM
The Bradley technology demonstrator would seem to have most of these Block2 features. The really transformation bit would be the inclusion of a remote control turret like the German Puma, which allows for a much expanded interior space, smaller turrets and lower wieght at the cost of more reliance on optronics
 
link
 
Quote    Reply

esmoore5       10/8/2009 11:36:31 AM
"The U.S. Army will not rule out any option for its new ground combat vehicle (GCV) program, including wheeled and tracked variants, which could possibly lead to the service examining the Marine Corps? Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV)." See: link Options Out For Ground Combat Vehicle&channel=defense How do EFV and Bradley compare?
 
Quote    Reply

VelocityVector    A Thought   10/8/2009 7:09:09 PM

Armored vehicles may benefit even more so than aircraft, especially in urban environments, from EO-DAS and helmet-mounted sight comparable systems.  You want eyeball pairs scanning in at least five directions through the vehicle skin at all times.  When price comes down and attention to keeping lenses clean improves, I would like to see both Brads and Abrahms kitted out with these.  That should be worth the cost by saving crew and extending platform survivability and relevance.

v^2

 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy