NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Transportation Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Smaller Is Often Better

August 3, 2009: Life in wartime has taught the U.S. Air Force that smaller is often better. First came the deal with the army, to buy some two engine C-27Js (a joint U.S./Italian upgrade of the Italian G-222) to get smaller cargos into places that the larger, four-engine C-130 would have problems with. The C-27J is as 28 ton aircraft that can carry nine tons for up to 2,500 kilometers. The U.S. Air Force bought ten C-27Js in the 1990s, but took them out of service because it was cheaper to deliver stuff via the larger C-130. However, the C-27J is a favorite with many other air forces, and draws on technology from the C-130J program (using the same engines, propellers and electronic items). The C-27Js  cost about $30 million each.

Even as the C-27Js began to arrive, the air force found out that there were places, especially in Afghanistan, where an even smaller transports would be useful. So now the air force is checking out getting some more Beech King Airs (which is already used as the MC-12 electronic reconnaissance aircraft and UAV substitute) The army began using the Beech Air King as the RC-12 in the 1970s, and has been seeking a replacement for the last few years. But it was realized that the RC-12 was suitable for use as a Predator substitute. The King Air 350 is a 5.6 ton, twin engine aircraft that, as a UAV replacement, carries only the two pilots. The sensors are operated from the ground. This enables the MC-12 to stay in the air for about eight hours per sortie. Not quite what the Predator can do (about twice the time per sortie), but good enough to help fill the demand. The MC-12 has advantages over UAVs. It can carry over a ton of sensors, several times what a Predator can haul. The MC-12 can fly higher (35,000 feet) and is faster (over 500 kilometers an hour, versus 215 for the Predator.) The MC-12s cost about $20 million each, more than twice what a Predator goes for. But the air force also sees the King Air as a small cargo/passenger aircraft, especially for the many special operations that must be supported.

Another candidate is the Cessna Caravan 208. This is a large, single engine, aircraft that can carry nine passengers or a ton of cargo. It costs about half what the King Air does, and is already popular as a passenger/cargo aircraft in remote parts of the planet. The air force wants to have some of these "light transports" in service by 2012.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article ARMOR: The Ugly Duckling Gets Another Order


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Herald12345       8/3/2009 5:58:22 AM
Even as the C-27Js began to arrive, the air force found out that there were places, especially in Afghanistan, where an even smaller transports would be useful. So now the air force is checking out getting some more Beech King Airs (which is already used as the MC-12 electronic reconnaissance aircraft and UAV substitute)
 
Now for the champions of the UAVs can do it all, ask yourself WHY?
 
Herald 
 
Quote    Reply

Chris       8/3/2009 10:18:32 AM

Even as the C-27Js began to arrive, the air force found out that there were places, especially in Afghanistan, where an even smaller transports would be useful. So now the air force is checking out getting some more Beech King Airs (which is already used as the MC-12 electronic reconnaissance aircraft and UAV substitute)

 

Now for the champions of the UAVs can do it all, ask yourself WHY?

 

Herald 



I think all they are saying is that they can use these aircraft for the same job IF a UAV isn't available.
 
But folks will have a hard time landing a UAV (especially large, cargo carrying versions) in unimproved airields in
restricted areas - at least for the foreseeable future.
 
 
Quote    Reply

esmoore5       8/3/2009 11:43:07 AM
Hmm, all this talk of light transports, and no one mentions the U-28A: link link
 
Quote    Reply

FJV    Because UAV's are not all that good.   8/3/2009 1:54:54 PM
For the same reason they also don't ask themselves why commercial air freight companies don't use UAV's for cargo flight to save on wages and outcompete the rest.
 
If the technology is that much better, then there's a fortune to be made by someone.
 
 
Quote    Reply

McDeath    FAA no like   8/6/2009 10:03:46 PM
The reason why UAVs are not being used in commercial applications is because the FAA and other airspace agencies do not like the idea of unmanned vehicles flying around in commerical domestic airspace.  An example of this is the extreme reluctance of tha FAA in allowing domestic law enforcement the use of UAVs such as in patrolling the border.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy