NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Warplanes Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

The Toughest Bird In The Upper Atmosphere

October 26, 2009: This year, two 41 year old American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft each achieved a record 25,000 hours in the air. One of these aircraft made three belly (landing gear up) landings, requiring extensive rebuilding after each incident. With a range of over 11,000 kilometers, the 18 ton U-2s typically fly missions 12-18 hours long. All U-2s have been upgraded to the Block 20 standard, so they can be kept in service for up to another decade. Or at least until the robotic RQ-4 Global Hawk is completely debugged, and available in sufficient quantity to replace all the U-2s. The U-2 has been in service since 1955, in small numbers. Only about 850 pilots have qualified to fly the U-2 in that time.

All this is something of a comeback for the U-2. Three years ago, the U.S. Air Force wanted to retire its 33 U-2 reconnaissance aircraft, and replace them with UAVs like Global Hawk. But Congress refused to allow it, partly for political reasons (jobs would be lost, which is always a live political issue), and some in Congress (and the air force) did not believe that Global Hawk was ready to completely replace the U-2.

Ever resourceful, the air force has decided to make the most of it by trying to turn the U-2s into UAVs. This is not cutting edge technology, the air force has been turning warplanes into UAVs for over half a century, mainly for use as target aircraft (usually for missile tests, which require very realistic targets if you want to be really sure the missile works.) Replacing the U-2 pilot with software and automated controls also solves several other problems. Since the U-2 only carries a single pilot, the aircraft cannot safely stay in the air as long as it could, because the pilot would become too fatigued. Currently, the max endurance for a U-2 is twelve hours. But without a pilot, and all the gear required by a pilot, you could carry more fuel, and keep a U-2 UAV in the air for up to 18 hours. Moreover, the U-2 can fly higher than the Global Hawk, and carry more sensors. So, in theory, a U-2 UAV is superior to Global Hawk.

The key unanswered question was how much will it cost to develop the software for flying the U-2 remotely, and how long would it take. The answers were too much and too long, so the pilots stayed, and the U-2 continues to get the job done. New Global Hawks continue to appear, but there is so much demand for the kind of recon work the two aircraft can do, that both pilots and robots will coexist for a while.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article ISRAEL: Israelis Still Have The Power


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

StevoJH       10/26/2009 6:21:00 AM
Except there are only 8,760 hours in a year. I stopped reading after that.
 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo       10/26/2009 11:39:14 AM
What's your point?  25000 flight hours would be about 3 years continuous flying.  For 41 years that would be an average 2 hrs/day.  Considering missions evidently run to 12 hrs, that would be flying a little more than once a week.  Where is the unpossible?
 
Quote    Reply

OldApacheGuy       10/26/2009 11:40:06 AM
The particular aircraft, in its lifetime, has recordwer over 25,000 hours.  No one was trying to change the number of hours in a year or claim that one aircraft recorded the same 25,000 hours in one year.
 
Quote    Reply

LB    610 hours a year   10/26/2009 11:59:00 AM
Why is it unreasonable that an aircraft averages 610 hours a year for 41 years?  The age of these aircraft indicate they were produced as U-2Rs and are now U-2Ss and were given the F118 engine upgrade around 10 years ago.
 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo    I suppose...   10/26/2009 5:16:32 PM
if you were looking for a fight,
 
This year, two 41 year old American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft each achieved a record 25,000 hours in the air. 
 
could be taken as reading 'this year they flew 25k hrs' instead of 'this year, their 41st, they reached the 25k hrs lifetime milestone' - IF you were looking for a fight.  Or, as seems more likely, you are ignorant.
 
Quote    Reply

StevoJH       10/27/2009 3:52:53 AM

if you were looking for a fight,

 

This year, two 41 year old American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft each achieved a record 25,000 hours in the air. 


 

could be taken as reading 'this year they flew 25k hrs' instead of 'this year, their 41st, they reached the 25k hrs lifetime milestone' - IF you were looking for a fight.  Or, as seems more likely, you are ignorant.



I took it as saying they had flown 25,000 hours within the past year. ;)
 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo       10/27/2009 12:47:10 PM
Well, at least you showed up to take your whuppin', boy!   
 
As one of my favorite SF authors used to say, 
 
And when someone makes a statement you don't understand, don't tell him he's crazy. Ask him what he means. -- H Beam Piper, "Space Viking" 
 
Quote    Reply

agtxr7    Real Capabilities   10/28/2009 5:03:58 PM
The real issue is that despite some similarities in airframe capabilities the U2 and GH do not share similar imagery capabilities, and at this time the GH does not have the capabilities for differing payloads with differing INT capabilities as does the U2.  Until the GH platform gains this capability diversity, or the U2 specific capabilities become actually, not theoretically obsolete, the U2 platform is still viable and productive.
 
Quote    Reply

kirby1       10/28/2009 6:09:06 PM
Turning the U-2 into a UAV is a beast of a challenge. The flight envelope is incredibly tight, and the landings are hair raising in the least.

But if it could be done, it would be a major massive advancement for UAV technology. And if it fails, you lost an old air frame that was heading to the bone yard in less then a decade anyways.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       10/29/2009 1:53:32 AM

Turning the U-2 into a UAV is a beast of a challenge. The flight envelope is incredibly tight, and the landings are hair raising in the least.

 
Normal flight will not be much of a problem, because the envelope is incredibly tight they had to develop an autopilot to handle it very early on to reduce pilot fatigue.
 
But the landings ...  no way.  There are just to many things that have to go right, and several are not on board the aircraft.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy