The Perfect Soldier: Special Operations, Commandos, and the Future of Us Warfare by James F. Dunnigan
More Books by James Dunnigan
|
Dirty Little Secrets
U.S. Troops Want a Better Bullet
by James Dunnigan
December 30, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic
The U.S. Marine Corps, responding to
reports from their troops, are investigating whether they should
replace the current 62 grain bullet, used in the 5.56mm round fired by
the M-16 and M-4 rifle, with a heavier bullet. Since last Summer, the
marines have been making the heavier, 77 grain bullet (normally only
issued to Force Recon and commando troops) available to commanders, to
use in place of the rounds with the 62 grain bullet. However, only six
percent of the 10.6 million 5,56mm rounds of ammo the marines have in
Iraq and Afghanistan, are the heavier 77 grain version. The debate over
the effectiveness of the NATO standard 62 grain bullet (and all 5.56mm)
ammo has been going on for decades, and has only intensified since 2002
(when it was used a lot in Afghanistan). The marines and the army are
working together on the problem, and will present their findings early
next year.
Many in the U.S. Army are
in favor of using a larger caliber bullet (7.62mm, as used in sniper
rifles like the M-14), or a 6.8mm round. The problem with the 5.56mm
round was that it was not designed to take down man sized targets (or
animal equivalents like white tailed deer, or black bears), and is less
effective in blasting through walls and vehicles during urban fighting.
When first introduced, it was intended for use by draftees, who were
often in need of automatic fire capability (because so few were
marksmen). This meant troops had to be able to carry more ammo, thus
the utility of the 5.56mm round. The 5.56mm bullet could wound, or kill
with a head or torso shot. But a determined enemy was often not stopped
by 5.56mm fire. Today, all the infantry are volunteers, much better
trained to hit targets with single shots, and increasingly demanding a
bigger bullet for doing that.
|
|
