The Perfect Soldier: Special Operations, Commandos, and the Future of Us Warfare by James F. Dunnigan
More Books by James Dunnigan
|
Dirty Little Secrets
Al Qaeda Getting Tagged as Losers
by Harold C. Hutchison
November 10, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic
The referendum on the Iraqi constitution is
over, with a turnout of 63 percent, compared with 58 percent in the January
elections to select the transitional government. The al Qaeda and Baathist
terrorists launched a total of 13 attacks – compared with 347 during the
January elections. In essence, for the fourth time in the past twelve months,
al Qaeda has failed to halt an election in either Afghanistan or Iraq. The next
elections, to select the parliament, are slated for December 15 pending the
results of the referendum. The constitution appears to have been ratified.
The successful referendum underscores just how impotent al Qaeda has become
since the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Four years ago,
al Qaeda was able to launch a coordinated attack that killed 3,000 people in
the United States. Now, al Qaeda has proven unable to oppose the United States
after American troops have liberated two countries in al Qaeda’s backyard.
These singular failures belie the claims of a quagmire coming from the
mainstream media and critics of the Administration. Al Qaeda has been rejected
by the people of Afghanistan and Iraq.
The American strategy of bringing democracy to Iraq is succeeding. So are the
tactics that are being used to implement it. While the results are unknown,
just the fact that the elections were held and were mostly violence-free is a
victory in and of itself. The fact remains that the United States is achieving
its objectives, while al Qaeda is not – al Qaeda is even failing to prevent the
American objectives from being met. By any objective standard, al Qaeda is
losing the war on terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only places they seem
to be winning are in a number of newsrooms in the United States, and in Spain,
where a series of bombs (combined with a major public relations misstep by the
Spanish government) led to a change in government and Spanish withdrawal from
Iraq.
This is not surprising. A number of the major media outlets have been focusing
on the IED attack du jour, while missing the bigger picture. Also, since the
failure to locate Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, the media has taken a
line that the liberation of Iraq was not worth the casualties (which are half
of the total of fatalities suffered by the allies on D-Day). The media’s tendency
to accentuate the negative has given al Qaeda a bit of a lifeline – their only
hope for victory is that the anti-war movement, fuelled by the mainstream
media, will wear down the political will of the United States.
|
|
